Product Marketing Adventures

Ever been hit with the classic, “We’re launching next week. Ready? Go.” moment? In this episode, we talk about why that scramble happens, what it costs, and how the best product marketing teams avoid it by getting clear on success, ownership, and the difference between a release and a real launch.

Doug Kimball joins me for a practical conversation on one of the biggest moves a PMM can make: rebuilding the go-to-market function from the ground up. Doug has led global marketing and product marketing teams, run major field kickoffs, and helped teams improve pipeline impact and collaboration using Pragmatic Institute principles. He also recently published a book on B2B positioning and messaging called So What? Why? Who Cares?.

Doug breaks down how he approached rebuilding GTM at Digital Science without overcomplicating it. We get into how to look back at what worked and what did not, align PMM work to revenue outcomes, clarify roles across product and marketing, and put frameworks in place so launches stop feeling like one-off fire drills.

We also do a messaging critique of OppTrack, a win-loss and competitive intelligence company, and talk about the difference between messaging that is clear and messaging that creates urgency. If you take one thing from this episode, it is this. Before you build the plan or ship the launch, nail the “so what.”


LINKS

Messaging Critique (OppTrack): https://www.opptrack.com/  

Connect with Doug: 

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dougkimball/  
Book: https://sowhatwhywhocares.com/  

Connect with Elle:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/elle3izabeth/ 
Website: https://www.productmarketingadventures.com/ 

What is Product Marketing Adventures?

Product Marketing Adventures is the only PMM show that goes beyond theory and into the real execution of product marketing. In each episode, experienced product marketers co-host two segments of the show: first a case study example of their work, followed by a messaging critique of companies we admire. Listeners enjoy a fun conversation packed with practical guidance to leverage in your product marketing career.

In product marketing,
there's a moment that

separates reactive teams
from strategic ones.

It's the moment when product
says, "Hey, we're launching

next week. Ready? Go."
And everyone scrambles.

No clear definition of
success, no clarity between

release and launch, no
agreement on who owns what,

and somehow PMMs are expected
to just make it happen.

Today, we're talking about one
of the most transformational

things a product marketer
can do, rebuild the entire

go-to-market function.

Not tweaking it or
optimizing it, rebuilding it.

With that, it is my
pleasure to have Doug

Kimball on the show.

Doug is one of the best
PMMs in the business.

Let me tell you why.

He successfully built and
managed global marketing and

product marketing teams in
multiple companies, helped

plan and deliver several
global field kickoffs, and

flipped product launches
on their head using the

Pragmatic Institute principles
while improving pipeline

impact, team collaboration,
and lead development.

And most recently, he
has been delivering his

expertise to the masses.

He just published a
book on upleveling B2B

positioning and messaging.

It's called, "So What? Why?
Who Cares?" Check it out.

You can find it on Amazon.

Oh, and if that weren't
cool enough, he has

also been training and
teaching Brazilian jujitsu

for more than 18 years.

Doug, it's amazing to
have you on the show.

Thank you.

I may have to pause for the
blushing part of this, but,

uh, thank you for that intro.

I've had an amazing
fortunate career.

I'm just happy to be
here, so thank you.

So cool, and, um, I'll
have to pick your brain

on the jujitsu piece.

We've been thinking
about trying that

out for our daughter.

I just feel like it's
something every kid should do.

Highly recommend.

All right, let's
dive right in.

So bring our listeners up to
be, up to speed a little bit.

You currently work
at Digital Science.

What do they do exactly?

G-good question.

A lot of people don't,
don't know that one.

So we are a-- Digital Science
is a company that basically

has a lot of B2C and B2B
focus, looking at how to help

bring research and information
to market, which there's

a lot of ways into that.

But we focus on academics,
funder, funders, um,

not-for-profit, government,
uh, publishers, B2C, and

really it's about bringing
and streamlining the

research process to market.

And I have the privilege,
I enjoy managing their

product marketing team.

Been there since August

Awesome.

It's helpful to have some
of the context about the

company itself because the
first segment of our show

is the case study, and the
case study is exactly about

rebuilding the go-to-market
function at, your current

place at Digital Science.

So, let's dig a little
deeper into that now.

So in the first segment of our
show, we're gonna do this case

study, right, of rebuilding
the go-to-market function,

and it's so meaningful
because it sits exactly at

the intersection of strategy
and influence and ultimately

operational excellence.

So take us back for a minute.

What was happening when you
first joined Digital Science?

Controlled chaos.

they had gone through--
They've gone through a

lot of acquisitions in the
last several years, and in

the beginning of twenty--
twenty twenty-five, they'd

gone through what they
call Evolve and kind of

tried to merge a bunch of
different units together.

We had disparate
marketing teams,

disparate product teams.

There really wasn't
a cohesive part.

So they, they did a very
good job of trying to

put that all together.

But when you have five
different segments and

you've got products that
go across segments and some

that are segment-oriented
only, there's a lot of,

uh, challenges going on.

Again, I'm not trying
to be negative.

It was just more, you
know, the usual chaos

It's more sophisticated, yeah.

Exactly.

what was really cool,
and one of the reasons

I was interested, is
they do a lot of really

innovative stuff there.

the ability to, for example,
track where a researcher might

be cited in a publication
someplace or track patent

information, things I really
hadn't thought about before.

Like, that's really
important stuff they do.

but the challenge was
that these business units

weren't always really
working well together.

We did a lot of
product launches.

I mean, more product
launches on average.

Companies our size, we were
doing twice as many product

launches than most companies.

So, when I talk about
launch, it wasn't just launch

sometimes as it was a release.

"Hey, we're gonna
release this.

Let's make a PR." I'm
like, "Well, that's not

really the same thing as
a launch." So part of it

was me just getting them
to understand that, release

and launch and go-to-market,
there is a little bit of a

difference apiece on that.

Yeah, yeah.

And that's, it's so funny you
mention that because I feel

like that's happened, every
PMM out there can attest to

experiencing that happen,
is what I'm trying to say.

So when launch means something
different to everyone, and

you don't really have a
go-to-market function when

you're doing that, when
everyone kind of is speaking

a different language.

so tell a little bit more
about specifically, like,

what was, what do you think
was broken in that situation?

The first thing that was
identified as broken was

that product owned the
commercial part of launch.

So product would say,
"We're gonna release XYZ

product feature name,
whatever it's gonna be

on April fifteenth." Why?

There wasn't really a plan.

It was more, "Well,
we're done, so we're

going to release it."

And again, that's going back
to the release versus launch,

which Again, I, I can't,
uh, be difficult about that.

A lot of companies do that.

They confuse release
versus launch.

So one of the first things
that I pushed in there was

saying, "No, marketing,
specifically product

marketing, needs to be the
one that owns the commercial

decision to make a launch."

We're the ones, as you
know just as well as I do,

that make all the pre- and
post-launch, especially

the post-launch people,
get things successful.

And if we're not involved
in that, if we're just being

tossed over the, the fence
and say, "Go launch, run,"

we're gonna run really fast
in a lot of wrong directions.

So, the other thing I started
asking about was basically,

why are we doing this launch?

Is there a particular
audience we're going after?

Are we trying to
prevent churn?

Do we have a new competitive
response we wanna do?

All those different
reasons of what is the,

the reason behind this?

I like this new
product feature.

That's not enough to
make a launch out of it.

This is gonna help us to push
back a competitive incursion.

Now I'm listening.

Or this is a major enhancement
to our AI capabilities and

gonna differentiate us.

Now we're doing something.

So we really didn't have
this, um, shared definition

of what success looked
like from a launch.

It was more we have released
it and we have launched and

we have made noise, and then
we kind of paused there.

So that was the... one of the
biggest things I think that

was, was broken beforehand.

Yeah.

Yes, yes.

So you have this, like,
lack of clarity, lack of

alignment, a- and then you
already mentioned right

away, like, ownership.

so now talk a little bit
about, like, the task at hand.

You know, at what point did
you realize, like, "Okay,

this isn't something we
need to tweak. Need, we need

to actually rebuild this"?

Yeah.

seeing a couple of launches
that got pushed out while

I was still coming on board
that, again, I don't wanna

say nothing has failed.

The, the company's quite
successful, doing great

things, but we don't
want a launch to do okay.

You know, we want a launch
to really just kick butt

and make some serious noise
and drive leads and drive

awareness and call it, you
know, we all want revenue.

And I started asking a lot
of questions and meeting

with the sales teams, the
product marketing team--

sorry, product management
team, leadership, and just

asking these questions of
what it was it that we wanted

to get out of a launch, what
that meant and what release

meant to them, and realizing
that we weren't doing enough

before a launch to have
things planned effectively,

and we weren't doing things
as well after a launch for

them to have true impact, uh,
from the market and drive a

commercial impact to that.

So it, it really is just me.

I mean, I'm very good
at asking questions.

Sometimes they're good,
sometimes they're dumb.

but I'd rather...

No such thing as
a dumb question.

I like that.

Uh, I'd rather be persistent
and, get the answer to a

question and then, then,
okay, what's the second

level of that question?

And okay, great, now I
understand that you and I

are not speaking the same
language when it comes down to

the answer to this question,
and here's what I define

this based on my- You know,
15-plus years of product

marketing as a launch, as
a commercial success, uh,

here's what you define that.

And then looking at it
from what are the revenue

goals that we're trying
to accomplish, because

again, a go-to-market
should drive revenue.

Are we mapping that back?

And so it was just a
lot of questions, a

lot of conversation.

But also because as I said,
we were kind of a, not a

cohesive product marketing
team when I came on door-

board just because of
the situation, was to...

I had to rebuild the
go-to-market function and

also define what product
marketing is, what we do.

What we don't do was just as
critical as anything else,

and then start to develop
those processes around how

we bring a product to market.

All the-- Everything from
the, "I have a product

release to talk about,"
to, "I'm nurturing the

flows 90 days later."

Yeah.

You make it sound easy by
saying, "Yeah, just rebuilt

the go-to-market function,"

you know?

No big deal.

an hour.

hours.

All right, guys, we're done.

But seriously, this is where
a lot of PMMs get stuck,

and I'm sure there's a lot
of differing of opinions or

approaches out there around,
like, how do you do this?

But I guess, like, break
down for me, like, your plan

of action and how you, how
you actually, like, did it.

You don't have to-- We're not
gonna go into the specifics

quite yet, obviously.

We're gonna build a
playbook together in just

a, in just a moment here.

But r-real quick, like,
just kind of bullet point,

like, what, what the
action was, the plan of

action to,

to

was, again, like I, I
always go back to the

questions because that's
just what I'm good at.

but it was really
just like... Okay.

So to, to, you know,
to your point, it was

not an easy thing.

It was not a short thing.

There's so many stakeholders
because, again, we have five

segments in the organization.

We've got product and we've
got sales, who are my let's

call my key audiences, and
then I have my boss as well.

I spent a lot of time with
each of the stakeholders

for each of those groups,
basically saying: What is it

d- that you are looking for
when it comes to defining

a successful product
launch or a go-to-market?

And go-to-market and
launch in the conversations

were treated kind of a
similar conversation.

and really, you know,
where are we now?

What are we doing now that,
that is, is our kind of

our state of, our state
of the union, the, the

regular thing we're doing?

What's working?

And like I said, some things
were working very well.

With the, the person who was
managing this and the project

manag- product management
office, fantastic job.

Uh, but what wasn't working?

And a lot of what wasn't
working was, I mean,

sales wasn't being
notified early enough.

Pre-sales wasn't getting
the information in order

to prepare for a demo.

Uh, lead generation or
demand, the growth marketing

teams weren't being fed
information in order

to plan for campaigns.

You know, I could go
on and on about that.

And once I understood all
that, again, like I said, I

came back and said, "Product
marketing is gonna be the

ones owning the decision
to go live." And I put--

During my, my first two
months, I put two launches

on hold because the product
marketer came to me and

said, "Here's where we are.

I wanna launch whatever,
you know, date," which

was like next week.

I said, "Well, do we
have this, this?" "No, we

don't." Like I said, "No,
we are not launching." I,

you know, I made myself
a little unpopular.

I probably still am a little,
but, but it... Again, it's not

about Doug, it's about does
this have a success with that?

this gonna serve the company?

Is it gonna serve
the customer?

And like, we're gonna
try to take the best

action that's going to

Yeah.

Yeah.

And, you know, we talked
about, and, you know, I

don't want, depending if you
want to get into it, but,

you know, we wa- we moved
into-- we tiered launches.

Nothing that's, you
know, dramatically new

and surprising there.

Tiered launches have been
talked about a lot of

these, your great podcasts.

but, you know, I had to
go then say, "Now we've

educated the, the teams on
what a good launch means,

how do we put that in

place?"

so another thing
we did, and again,

nothing, you know,
dramatically unusual for

product launches, is talking
about a tiered framework and

really provide more clarity
around what those were.

Agreed, we had an agreed
through framework,

what assets will
be part of that.

Introduced a new,
basically a framework of

90-60-30, 30-60-90, we
can talk about that later.

Really worked to imple-
improve our product

requirement documents.

So taking that, the so what,
why, who cares framework,

embedding that in there,
putting together a launch

council, and just really
made it much more clear where

stakeholders were going to
be involved in this process.

And, that only took two hours.

You know, as you were,
like right before

you said it actually,

as you were answering some of

my previous questions, I
could actually start to

see the so what, why, who
cares just in how your

brain thinks.

So I just really love that.

you mentioned so much
here that I want to unpack

further, which I know
will come to the playbook,

but first I wanna quickly
ask about stakeholders.

How did you manage their

expectations and like, I guess
with all these big changes

you wanted to make, like was
there, was there pushback,

and just how did you manage

all

of that?

Very fortunate in that the,
uh, uh, I guess her, I'm

not sure exactly her title,
I call her head of product.

She's kind of, she's not
a CPO, she's below...

that reports to the CPO.

She is also newer, new-newer
to the organization.

She is-- She's awesome.

She's a gem, and we have,
we gelled very early on, so

we've got a very good rapport.

Uh, we don't always
agree, but we, uh,

disagree constructively,

if it makes any sense.

So having her on board, and
she and I are very aligned,

uh, she's also gone through
the Pragmatic Institute

training and a lot,
which was helpful.

That was really, really big.

So she was help, able to

help, you know,
go upstream on her

side and, you know,

had the alignment
on my side with

things.

But she also would say,
"You should talk to so and

so forth, and

have those
conversations with that

particular product manager
or that particular product

lead, uh, that pre-sales
person." So there's a lot

of just identifying you
know, who had a, a stick

in the fire that needed to

poke.

Uh, and that was
really important.

But also then going back

and looking again at
the massive amount of

launches we already had
and seeing how they did and

seeing where they did well
and seeing where they didn't

do as well.

So it was really just
about understanding

all the facets of what

happened with the product
launches, releases

and launches to define
where it didn't work.

Yeah, and I could imagine
that as, you know, you're the

new guy in town, and here you
are evaluating past launches.

That could not feel great, I
would imagine, to the person

whose work is being evaluated
from a person who wasn't even

there when it all happened.

So I'm curious, and, and
now, and, and you have

new ideas and thoughts,

and it sounds like you're
lucky that you have a, a

stakeholder who is amenable
and open to hearing you

out and like wanting to
support you, so that's

already a step ahead.

But how did stakeholders
and leadership respond

to you coming in and

doing that?

I got really good
at tap dancing.

Um, overall, I would
say pretty good.

There, you know, there were a
couple of conflicts here and

there that, you know, some
I created some challenges

with, some it was more
miscommunication, here's what

you mean, here's what I mean.

Uh, some just
plain disagreement.

No, we're gonna
do it like that.

and I try to find that
balance between, you know,

being the new guy and
having that honeymoon period

and coming in, "Hey, let's
do this," and full of

ideas and full of energy.

You know, also having been
there, done that a few

times, been on both sides
of that, that I can't just

walk in like the bull in
the China shop and say, "I

have all the right ideas.

We're gonna do it Doug's way,"
'cause it's not Doug's way.

It's, it's our way.

but also having had
several people in the first

three or four months say,

"We think you should be more
pushy," which was weird for

me because it's just not my
style, and I'm used to working

with global organizations.

I had people-- I've had
people say that to me too, and

that's not my style either.

I'm just, I'm a
little bit softer

in my approach.

think there's definitely a
time to do that, and I, I

am all about collaboration,
let's get all in

the same boat going together.

but also I have learned over
the years, sometimes you

just gotta push forward,
you know, knowing that

you're doing what is the

right thing for the
organization, not

for Doug, but for the

organization.

and just, just
really push through.

and, so again, taking it

back to why it
was so important

that product marketers
owned the commercial

launch decision, because
again, we understand what's

going on in the marketing.

We hand- we handle
the messaging.

We're looking at revenue

outcomes.

Not that product market-
managers don't care about

revenue, but we're closer
to that revenue and that

strategic side of things.

So yeah, there was some
education and there was

some little bit of bruised
feelings, and I had to step

back sometimes and say,
"I'd like this, but

I'm gonna get this."

Yeah.

A lot of

compromise.

And I'm sure over, over time
you prove, you kind of earn

trust and you, you prove how
your ideas and your frameworks

are working, and then you,
you get a little more.

That's sometimes that's
just how it works.

so it sounds like, you
know, stepping back here,

you had to, to rebuild this

go-to-market function.

A lot of sophistication,
a lot of like layers of

complexity with all these
different business units,

and it's kind of messy and,
you're in r- your reaction

mode or the, the, the
team is in reaction mode.

Um, and then you've come
in, you did all this

research, you implemented
all of these things.

What happened

in the

end?

Success, honestly.

That's what really kind
of feels good about this

is that, you know, I was
just on a call about an

hour ago with that head of
product I was talking about.

so we, we, we kicked
it off January 1st, so

we have an, an... We,
we-- So let me back up.

That's jumping ahead.

We put together all the
processes, laid them all

out there, documented
them, communicated to the

teams that are gonna be

involved, both on webinars and
on email and pri- in slides.

Uh, I presented to some
of the senior management

to say, "Here's what
the, the short version.

Here's what we're
gonna be doing.

Here's what the
why behind this is.

Here's the value it's gonna
yield." made better role

alignment between what
product managers do and what

product marketers will do.

Still some education
ongoing about that one, but

making a lot of progress.

Uh, put together a launch
council as part of the whole

process so that, you know,

there was the, the key
stakeholders from each group

that needs to be part of
this whole launch success

process were involved.

Kicked the first one off
or early part of January,

um, '20-- this year, 2026.

Uh, and even in just that
first meeting, you're watching

some of the chat come through
and it's like, "This is

what we've been needing

all along.

This is a great way for us to

change our go-to-market
pro..." I mean,

people are saying

that, not product

marketers.

You know, product managers
and other people are saying

positive things in the chat.

You're

like,

"Win. I can go home now."

and also to be very honest,
and this is what I was just

talking to my head
of, head of product

about, 'cause she was, you
know, "Well, you know, I

feel like we're not doing
this. We're not... We're

missing... People are
complaining about this."

And I said, "I agree." I
said, "Remember, 80/20.

Let's get

80% of the things lined up
and we're doing great things,

we're making great progress.

Where we were, where we are
now to where we were four or

five months ago is
hugely improved." I

said, "We have to sit

back and go, 'Okay,
we're making progress

over perfection.

We've, we've chipped
away all the rough parts.

Now we're smoothing

things off.'" So we have to

remind people that we've
made tremendous progress.

We're not a hu-
we're not 100%.

We may never get to 100%,
but we can get a lot

better, then I'm happy.

I love it.

Okay.

So what I wanna do is take
this case study and now

turn it into a playbook.

So, uh, again, just
quickly summarizing here,

we're rebuilding the
go-to-market function.

No easy feat.

so let's say that I'm a PMM,
I just heard your story,

and now you're coaching me
on how I can replicate it.

And if I needed to rebuild
my go-to-market function

in my company, what is step
one What do I need to do

First,

First, put on your-- If you
have experience, first put on

your humble hat, is the best
place I would start, and then

start gathering information.

Uh, because again, if you

walk in as that person
that I know how to fix

everything, you're gonna
get the same response that

most people do.

But understand where are
we now, where do we wanna

be, what's been, been
successful, what's not been

successful, what does good
look like is one of the

things I always go back to.

And how do we-- everything
we do when it comes to

the go-to-market and
the launch change, how

does that end up driving
or impacting or benefiting

revenue or preventing
revenue leakage?

You know, we're
looking at churn.

So start there.

Who are my stakeholders?

Who needs to be involved?

Who should I talk to?

Be data-driven.

I mean, and understand what's
happened well in the past.

If hopefully your CRM is
halfway decent, you can dig

into your CRM information
or at least get some kind

of a launch details back and
use that to plan the future.

Got it.

Okay.

So step one is to
get this state of the

union Dig into the data.

gather information.

is there

anything specific that
you're looking for?

I think you mentioned a couple
of things, but are there

like specific measurements
or signals that you could

be looking for that would

specifically help you
identify like what's broken

within a like go-to-market

function?

Like

Let's take a tier one
launch as a good example.

Um, so we have a tier one
launch, which in, in our

case, it's a big launch.

We're doing big things.

We're gonna make a
lot of noise, a lot

of assets behind that.

And we do this big launch,
maybe we do a webinar, we do

some lead activity, but then
we look back at the leads

that have come in and the,
the, the awareness that have

come in and the click-throughs
that have come in after that.

And if the, if the numbers are

low, and of course, metrics
are going to be defined by

a lot of different things.

If the numbers are low, but
we had a really big deal we

tried to make, then
something got missed.

So that's where looking at the
data is like we tried to...

We made-- This was a powerful
solution, but we didn't do

a good job of engaging the
market before and after the

commercial part of the launch.

We missed something.

So that's one of the
places you can look at for

data is, did it resonate?

we excited launch

and was the market
excited to hear about it?

Yeah.

Yeah.

Good one to call out.

Okay.

So again, quick recap.

Step one, gather the data.

what's step two?

make sure that.

your product marketers
and your product managers

are hand-in-hand.

they don't have to be
best friends, but they

should be very much
embedded, be, be aligned.

Uh, make sure they know what--
You do this, and I do...

Here's where my job, I hate
to say job stops, but here's

where I stop being involved,
and I hand it off to you.

Uh, clarify again that product
marketing/marketing should own

the commercial part of this.

Make sure that we're the ones

that- That say, "Yes, ready to
go." and you absolutely have

to be involving, involving

sales.

And by that mean, by
that I mean they are

educated, they're aware.

You don't launch something,
then sales goes, "Oh,

hey, what, what's
the pricing on this?"

Or, "What's the messaging?"
Or, "Who's the audience?"

Uh, make sure that they're
involved in all that, and

have an executive sponsor.

That is one of the most
key things so that that way

it's not just the product
marketer saying this, it's

the person sponsoring saying,
"I'm sponsoring this launch.

We've got to get in line here
and get things successful."

Yep.

I love Essentially what it
sounds like you're saying

is establish or reestablish

the product marketing charter.

So I have had to
do this before, and

w- I-- This is so So
I did it at Cisco.

Cisco obviously has been
around for a long time.

There were product marketing
teams ahead that, that were

this portfolio ahead of me.

But when I presented the draft

of a charter, before I
socialized it outwards,

I had product leaders
The VP directors, right?

That I wanted see my first
draft charter before I

socialized it even to my team.

And they, they had some
feedback, but like overall

they were like, "We've
never seen something

like this before.

Like, we love this."
And I think it's because

they're like, "Yes, product
marketing is collaborating.

Yes, of course, we
want you to have a seat

at the table." We just...
You know, I think so.

It's so interesting.

I, I'm glad that
you mentioned it,

I guess is what I'm saying,
because they-- It's not that

they want to exclude product
marketing, but just someone

to come in and really like
own the, uh, function, I

think is actually something
that your PM will appreciate.

Um, there.

Okay.

So now we've got the, we've
gathered the information.

You have your, you know,
people and team alignment.

That was, you know,
your step two.

So let's skip to step
three, like what's next?

We talked about the
tiers, and then we, we,

I'll just, just jumping.

We only, we did a
three-tier level.

I've seen three,

four, and five and,
however, however works for

that particular company.

We only did three, and
then we narrowed down, you

know, one is the biggest.

And here's, we do
all these stuff.

We listed out what went in
there, what kind of assets.

Right now we're continuing
to build that out.

I've got members of my team
that are helping to build out,

you know, here's an example
of the assets that we're gonna

use for a tier one and for a
tier two and for a tier three.

Um, and by the way, I'm
taking... I forget which

guest it was you had that
talked about social swarming,

um, in the launch process.

I'm taking that idea and
I'm building that into

stuff that we're doing.

So see?

You, you bring
value all around.

And so the, the way I looked
at the 30-60-90 again is, and

the, the way I kind of joked
with you earlier in our prep

was looking at how NASA works.

I mean, NASA doesn't just,
you know, have a l- rocket

launched off to the moon and
then walk out of the building

and say, "We're done for

the week." they gotta stay

engaged.

So if we don't do a

good job of making
sure that once we

launch this amazing product
or feature or solution to the

market and keep
in touch with the

audience out there, then we're

not doing a very good job.

and so the structure with
that, that, that 30-60-90,

I think will make a big

difference

in

ongoing flows and engagement
and nurture, but not

just what happens
to drive the, the

interest of the prospect,
but us getting feedback.

You know, we're
putting messages

out there And we check
into that 30 days in.

60 days in.

Is it

resonating?

All right.

What, what feedback
do we take back

in?

And again, now we're
feeding that, doing

that.

feedback loop back up
to say, "This went well.

This needs to be

tweaked

going forward." So it's
really trying to create

a, a, a, a framework
and a feedback

loop.

I

love your rocket analogy.

Like, you don't just, like,
send it off into space and

be like, "All right, cool
launch. See you later."

Yeah,

you measure the,

you know, the orbit
stability and the fuel,

and you track trajectory.

Like, that's all your 30/60/90
or, or 90/60/30, 30/60/90.

And I love that.

it's spread out like that
because so many PMMs launch

it, and then they're like
just onto the next one.

And by doing the feedback,
you get better, you improve,

you figure out how to tweak
things, whether it's messaging

or even product roadmap items.

So I love that.

Going back to leadership,
and I've been doing that, uh,

just in the last few weeks.

I've been presenting to the
chief operating officer.

I'm presenting to the
chief of staff, I think,

next week.

the chief commercial officer,
just kind of making sure they

understand what's going on.

Tried to do some of
this before this all

happened, and there was
some email communication,

but just schedules,
end of year budgeting

didn't happen.

so if I had a
recommendation for a

PMM, ideally do it before
you implement the major

change as opposed to after.

This was situational.

you know, feedback
always important.

We had the buy-in from
pretty much everybody that

was part of the process.

That was very important.

Again, having a very good
partner, it made a big

difference with that.

Uh, and just making

sure people continue
to understand that we

have to let some things

run for a bit before we
start making any changes.

So as opposed to
saying, "Well, it's

not working right." it's,
we're on month two.

You know, we just started

this

Yeah.

you're not even in the
full 90 days of your...

Yeah.

Yeah.

You gotta give it time,
see if it's working.

Okay, I love that.

You socialize it, you
start to gather feedback.

so and then step five.

Is there a step five

Go.

just go.

And, and it, it... And
I, I'm being a little

flippant, but go And making
sure that we tell all the

people that are involved
in the... Oh, sorry, the

people, the teams that are

involved in this, you know,
is, is pre-sales feeling like,

"Okay, cool, we're now getting

information ahead of time that
we weren't getting before, so

now we can do a better job of
supporting sales and getting

demos set up." you know,
does sales feel like they've

got their talk tracks ready?

Does customer service
feel like they can be

able to answer questions
that, are coming in?

You know, are the PMMs and
the PMMs... That's a lot

of Ps. PMs and the PMMs

feeling like they're
working together?

Are we getting
that feedback loop?

Uh, and just go.

and you know, for the
product marketers listening

to this, you know, if
you're a company of

100, you may not need to put
together a launch council.

It may just have to be you
and your PM and a couple

of people and get it

go.

Larger companies,

I do recommend a launch,
a launch council because

you've got a lot more,

you know, just hurdles to go
through, a lot more people to

be bought into that so having
that, and especially that

executive sponsorship, makes

a big difference.

Yeah.

A quick question about
the executive, or sorry,

for the launch council.

How often do you meet?

Who's in it?

And like what kind of

decisions do they

own?

it's... The, as far
as own it is, who is

on it in our case, is

the, the, the person
who's the product

manager for that
particular item, the, uh,

segment leader for that

particular... W- whoever this

had the most impact
in the segment.

Obviously, the product
marketer, the head, the

head of pre-sales for that

particular segment.

So anybody who is going to

be most directly
commercially impacted

by the launch is involved.

Uh, the product product
management officer, the person

who basically is coordinating
all the craziness,

um, from the... More the, the
tick box as opposed to the

product marketer who com- who
mana- manages the commercial

part of that.

I sit in on some of them.

I

try not to 'cause I want
my product marketers

to be the owners of

those

things.

You know, they're the
owners of their world.

Uh, and How often
do they meet is

kind of evolving
at this point.

it's sort of a check-in
sometimes, and they...

Again, from the... What
they're deciding on

is, are we ready to go?

have we, have we ticked the

boxes?

Do we have what

we need?

If we

haven't done so, then
again, that's where you have

the, you know, the, the,
the, leaders on there say,

"Hey, get this stuff done.

You, you, you are responsible
and accountable to move

these things forward.

What's the roadblocks?

How do we eliminate

those?"

Yep.

And then, all of that, I'm
curious, you mentioned earlier

on in our conversation,
you dropped like a, a hint

about PRDs and your team
coming in and to reshape

them, and obviously your
book is coming out, "So

What, Why, Who Cares?" Uh,
can you talk a little bit

about how so what, why, who
cares changed some of those

conversations, like whether
inside the product launch

council or not, but how did
the so what, why, who cares

change some of those internal

conversations?

Yeah, definitely.

And that's-- It's been

really

kind of fun to watch that

evolution happen.

It's still it's still
a work in progress, but

in-instead of always having
PRDs come in that were just

a

feature function,
technical dump written as a

product manager
is going to write.

And again, there's no
criticism at all in there.

It's just how, that's
how they think and how

they write.

But because we didn't have

as much early collaboration
back, back then between

the product manager and

the product marketer,
what came out of the PRD

was sort of mildly
massaged and

turned into

messaging.

Now, with the So What, Why,
Who Cares framework that

the

product marketers are
using, they're translating

that much better

into

outcome-based messaging.

But my product
leader is also very

comfortable with me
going back to the product

management team and saying,
"Here's how we think.

Here's how product
marketers like to

understand messaging,"

so that what they take
and put into the PRD is

pre-messaging prepped,
for lack of a better word.

And they're think
It does this.

Okay, cool.

So what that it does that?

And

think that's-- Again,
we're not there yet.

We're making
progress, for sure.

and it's just helped them,
helped the product managers

to be more aware that you
have to focus it on is what a

confused prospect might want
to understand, not what we

as informed technical people

understand.

Yeah, sure.

okay.

So I wanna really
quickly recap, uh, what

I think the steps were.

So one is just to gather
information, talk to

people, dig into data.

Two was to align the team and
make sure everybody's on the

same page about who does what.

Three is apply your
launch framework.

That's where the like

90/60/30,

30/60/90 framework and the
so what, why, who cares

framework really comes into

play.

And then you socialize
it, get feedback, and then

you execute while still

doing

the feedback.

Um, so I love

that.

My last question for
you, just for this

segment of the

show, is what advice do
you have for, one piece of

advice, so just one, one, one

big takeaway, what is it
for a PMM who is rebuilding

the go-to-market function?

Be confident in your knowledge
of being customer-facing

because we are the strategic
people who don't just come

back and say, "Here is
information." We should

be providing insights
and recommendations to

give guidance on that.

And by, if I sum- if I
try to summarize that

means don't launch just
because we think we should.

Launch because there's a
reason and a commercial

impact we're gonna have to
drive revenue so that we

demonstrate our, our ability
to impact revenue decisions.

Mm-hmm, and a lot of that
comes from knowing the

business and having that
context and understanding the

customer and being really

confident in that.

Yep.

So helpful.

I love it.

Okay, we're wrapping

up the

case study playbook
segment of the show, and

now it's time for the next
segment of the show, which is

"
so fun.

It's the messaging critique.

So this is where,
Doug, you and I as

marketing, product marketing
experts get to analyze real

world messaging.

the rules of

this are, one, to pick a
company that either you

know the target
audience really

well or you

are the target audience.

Wouldn't be fair to
critique messaging

on a company where we have no
idea that, who their target

audience is or what they do.

and then first tell me
what stood out to you

about the messaging, what
you're loving about it.

Maybe share something y-

that you wish the

PMM would've considered
or done differently.

And then finally, we're
gonna just brainstorm

a little bit and

give that PMM some good
ideas on how they can

take it to the next level.

So without further

ado, yeah,

reveal the company that we

will be

looking at

today.

The company is called,
they're called OppTrack,

So O-P-P Track.

Uh, and it's
either .com or .io.

I

think it's .com.

And they are

essentially a

win-loss and competitive
intelligence smaller

startup company.

And I picked them.

for a couple of reasons.

Definitely I'm the
target audience.

I know a decent
amount about win-loss.

In fact, I just presented
at the Austin conference

about win-loss.

They reached out
to me, which is

how I became aware of them,

not to sell me initially,
but to gather and

ask my feedback as a startup.

So I'm like, "Well,
that was kind of an

interesting way to approach
that." So I give them a

lot of respect for that.

So is it optrack.io?

So what I, what I found
when I Google searched

it is O-P, one P,

O-P-T-R-A-C,

Yeah, two

Ps. Yeah, For, for so for,
I think Opportunity Track.

Uh, try opportunity...

opptrack.com.

okay.

So it's optrack.io
doesn't work.

Okay, let me try optrack.com.

Just for our folks
who may wanna follow

along, um, I found them.

There they are,
O-P-P-T-R-A-C-K.com.

I found them.

Okay.

What

is standing out to you
from their messaging?

And before

And before I tell you
the goods, I'll have

to give them also

credit because during our

conversations with them,
you know, I was looking

through the tool, I was

pretty, you know,
impressed with what I saw.

But they also, you know,
"What, what do you think?" I'm

like, "Well," I said, "I'm not
sure what you guys do yet."

And because what
they there on their,

their, their main page before,
it was not, wasn't bad, it

just was very-- it was much
more technical language.

So I gave them a
bit of feedback.

So I give them a

lot of

credit, and even in
the last three or four

days, they've made

some changes So what stands
out to now open up the

page, and I've got no

question what

they do.

They do competitive and
win-loss for lean go-to-market

teams.

Now, I

don't love that it says

competitive win-loss agents
for lean G- GTM teams, but

that's just a Doug style
thing, 'cause agents could

be any number of things.

I know it's probably

agentic AI,

et cetera.

But

Yeah.

me a bit of like,

what does that

mean?

Little bit of guessing.

What's working for me is
that they clearly state

their ICP, like right there

in the header.

It, it stands out, and
then underneath that it.

says, you know, what,
OpTrack is a win-loss program

that does... it.

does certain

things, and then it
tells you the agents

use these to

align your messaging,
protect deals.

And again, they've already
started, in my mind,

done some of the so what,
why, and who cares in

there because they've
said what it does, who

it's targeted for, to
your point, the ICP.

It's giving a decent sense

of, um, alignment with
somebody like myself

who's coming in and

saying, I'm struggling
getting good comp- competitive

intelligence insights.

I'm struggling knowing what
to do with the win-loss

details or how to get
that." Um, so I like that.

And the fact that it
says agents, when I

take my anti-AI thought o- off

hat for a minute, means
maybe I don't have

to do as much work.

So that's kind of
intriguing too.

But it, it does give me a
bit of an intrigue as well

as a dislike of agents.

That's just a Doug

thing.

Yeah, I get it.

Yeah, you're like, "I'm
willing to look even

though I'm... got a little
bit of suss about anything

with agents and AI." I get it.

Okay.

So what then is-- what do
you wish the PMM would've

considered differently?

I'm gonna guess that it
has something to do with

agents, but maybe not.

Maybe

not.

well, I, I don't know if
They have a PM, so that's

another very good question.

I, I, think if I, was to, to,
rip it apart even more, is to

tell me some more of the why.

I mean, they tell me what I
can do, which is good, and

there is a little bit of a why
in there, but I'm missing...

They go from the, the

what to how it
does it, which is

cool.

Uh, it's nice to know the
behind-the-scenes piece, and

it's got little
diagrams in there.

But for me, it's also
important to know more why

this resonates with me as a

person looking for more
information about win-loss

programs to gather all

that.

Why is OpTrack better,
different, faster,

stronger, whatever it is,

more useful than fill
in the blank other

competitive intelligence
or win-loss programs?

Um, that me is
really important

because, uh,

as I'm sure you've
seen, there's a

lot of people out
there doing these

programs.

Why, why this one?

Or why do I add you

to my tech stack?

Or why do I replace

something in my tech stack?

It would be helpful.

Yeah.

Yeah, Yeah, The like com-
competitive alternative,

whether the alternative is
a sol- software solution or

like a spreadsheet, right

Um, yeah, so I definitely
agree with you.

They do a lot of educating,
like education, educating on

like what their solution is
and what it does and what it

can do, but they don't-- I,
I'm struggling to see, well,

what is your differentiator?

Um, so I, I agree with you.

I think that's really smart.

Okay.

So how can this product
marketer or just marketer

or founder, whoever, how can
they take their messaging

storytelling to the

next level?

my book?

No, sorry, that was too easy.

Uh, I think taking their,
their messaging and

their, their framework to

the next level
really is to just

put yourself in your
prospect's shoes as

much as possible.

Don't make assumptions
that they know exactly

why they're going

to

look at your site,

whether they've come across
it through LinkedIn or

an outreach.

What, what's gonna
make me want to engage?

So, okay, cool.

I, I see what you do.

This is very interesting.

I see that.

But again, I go back to
the, the why I should care.

I think they do
a decent job of

nailing the you

know, the, the persona,
like you said, the

ICP and the what.

It's just that
in-between piece of

how do I not-- how
do you not sound like

every other win-loss

company out there
and give me that

emotional...

That's one

thing I think,
there's not a lot of

emotion in

here.

There's not a lot of
pain point in here.

It's, it's very good
They, like, They,

I like the education

piece,

but emotion and pain

point give me.

urgency.

you know?

Create some FOMO in me.

Like, oh geez, if I don't
use this not gonna get access

to blah, blah, blah, blah.

Or I can't answer
these questions or

inform my sales teams.

Make me feel like I'm
not a I hate to say that.

Not that, make me feel
I'm not doing a good

job, but You know,

what I

mean.

Right.

There's not like a
sense of urgency.

Like there's no
sense of urgency.

no-- it doesn't tell
me why I need this now.

It doesn't... Not
that they should like,

you know, invoke
anxiety or anything.

Like you could, you could
shoot for another emotion

like joy or, you know, any,
that, that sort of thing.

So I totally agree with you.

Um, but overall it looks
like, especially after

conversations that you've
had with them, that they're,

they're continuing to
evolve their messaging.

Um, and just wanted to
say like messaging is

so hard, especially if
you don't have a product

marketer, it is so hard.

Yeah.

So, uh, but you know,
shout out to OpTrack.

You know, I think you guys
are clearly continuing

to iterate and, um, it

looks like you maybe

have a

cool

Yeah.

it's, I, I've been but
they've, they've made changes

just based on what I've
talked to the people too.

I'm like, "This is pretty
good." This, they're

getting better, so I think

it's

good.

Yeah.

Keep the evolution going.

That's where everything,
everything just of

continues to
evolve and iterate.

All right.

So Doug, I, one thing I
always like to do on this

podcast is leave time
for a moment of gratitude

Because in product
marketing, maybe in, in

just life in general,
none of us get here alone.

We are always

learning from each

other and building off
of each other's work,

and we're all better

for

it.

So before we wrap

up,

I just wanted to
say a genuine thank

you for your time
and insights today,

um,

and all the preparation
that, you've done for

the episode today.

So thank you so

much.

Really

it's been a pleasure.

I've been looking forward
to this, uh, since I

first listened to your
podcast and waved my

hand at you and you said

yes.

I'm like, "Yay,

this is fun."

Aw.

Thank you.

Thank you.

So I wanna turn it
over to you, though.

Like, who are some PMMs
that you maybe wanna shout

out who've helped, you
know make a real impact on

your career?

It's

Yeah.

It would be a very long list
if I went through them all.

I'll, I'll focus on two.

Uh, one is actually the
person that inspired me

with-- to write the book

because he gave me the
framework, Prashant Bhatia,

who I've worked for three
times as a VP, as even

as a CMO, um, really

upleveled my product marketing
abilities, my mindset, my

thinking, gave me a lot
of opportunities to do

stuff

that I look back

now, I'm like, "That
was really cool." so

that was, I mean, a
great leader, great

person, good friend,
just very inspirational.

And then a product
marketer who worked for me

for four years,

uh, Ian Pittock, based in the

UK, who--

I mean, just his style
gave me different ways

to

think about things and to

talk about and,
and message things.

So, um, between Prashant
and, Ba- and, you know, Ian,

just two people I

look back as having
really solid impacts on

my overall

product marketing journey.

Um, couple other people,
people I wanna call out,

and I know that
she's been called out

before, but Hattie.

I mean, reason
I wanna call out

Hattie, she hasn't
done as much to inspire

my

product marketing
journey, but she's doing

so

much to inspire

others.

I just love that
because it's just,

it's just that giving
and helping other

people get

better, you know, just as I

told...

generosity.

Yeah.

And then Michelle, who I'm
not gonna try and pronounce.

Michelle Nieberding,
I hope I'm

saying that.

Yes.

Thank you.

Um, because, uh, again, the
stuff she puts out on AI,

again, that unselfish sharing

of stuff and information.

I mean, what she posted
about lovable made me

completely revise my

website for my
book that just--

I mean, I

keep saying, every
lovable just blows me

away.

Without her making about that,
I would probably spend a few

hundred, probably $1,000 on a
website that I'm now, because

of

her sharing as a product
marketer to make other

Yeah.

better.

Yeah.

And,

oh, And at the risk of being

self-serving, this
lady named Elle.

I mean, again,
I've listened to

your pod- I, sorry.

I

mean that sincerely.

I've listened to your
podcasts, and again,

you're doing something

that,

again, just helps other
product marketers, other

growth marketers out
there to get better,

so thank you.

That's the goal.

That's the goal.

If it's, um, you know, truly
gives joy, and I think,

I don't want to speak for
Hattie and Michelle, but,

um, ha- both of them have
been guests on the show.

Um,

Michelle's

episode's not out yet,
but it will be soon.

Um, having met with both
of them multiple times,

they're just, they're so
generous, and, you know,

just the kind of people
that you wanna work with.

Like, and I, I'm probably,
probably the other folks

that you mentioned that
you gave shout-outs to

are probably similar,

like, like-minded
people, you know?

We tend to find each other in

circles.

Content good

Okay, my last, yeah, my
last question for you is

where can we continue to
access your expertise?

Is LinkedIn best?

Anywhere

LinkedIn is probably--
I mean, I'd love to

connect with anybody.

Always happy to have
LinkedIn chats there.

And then my website,
sowhatwhywhocares.com.

Um, I'm gonna continue
to build my portfolio and

updates in the book and
just share fun stories.

I love that.

Again, thank you
so much, Doug.

Yeah, and hey, PMM
listeners, if you like

this episode, please share
it with a PMM friend.

I would be so grateful if you
would also leave a review.

It helps tremendously
with our reach.

Thank you so much
for coming on this

adventure with us today.

I hope this episode
leaves you with

inspiration to take on the

next step of your own journey.